Subscribe Now: Apple Podcasts | Spotify
If you have been running Facebook™ and Instagram™ Ads for a while, you have probably felt it. Something has changed.
Targeting does not work the way it used to.
There was a time when you could spend hours choosing interests, building lookalike audiences and stacking ad sets. You would worry about picking the “perfect” audience and hope you had not missed a hidden interest that would turn everything around.
In 2026, things look very different. The good news is that this can actually make your ad strategy simpler, as long as you understand what Meta™ wants now.
In this post, I am going to walk you through what is working with targeting this year, why Advantage+ is showing up again and again in top performing campaigns and where you should focus your energy instead of obsessing over interests.
We are not targeting the way we used to
If you have been in Ads Manager recently, you will have noticed that many detailed interests are gone. The list is shorter. Many favourites have disappeared.
On top of that, even when you do enter interests or upload custom audiences, Meta™ usually expands beyond them by default. You are no longer fully controlling exactly who sees your ads in the same way you once did.
Lookalike audiences have also changed. They are not useless. In some accounts they can still perform well. However they are no longer the clear winner that they used to be.
Across the ad accounts I manage and support inside Abundant Ads Academy, the best performing campaigns now most often use:
- One main campaign and ad set.
- Advantage+ targeting.
- Strong creative and lots of variation in the ads.
Which can feel uncomfortable at first. It means trusting Meta™ to find your audience. The real question becomes, how do you help Meta™ find the right people?
Key 1: Your campaign objective and tracking must be correct
Meta™ can only optimise based on the data you give it.
If your campaign objective is wrong, your pixel is not firing properly or your custom conversions are missing, Meta™ is guessing. And guessed targeting usually equals expensive leads and weak results.
For example, imagine you are promoting a webinar. Your real goal is registrations. You want people to sign up and watch.
To help Meta™ find more of those people, you need:
- A conversion or leads campaign.
- The correct event or custom conversion set up for registrations.
- That event firing reliably when someone completes the form.
When that is in place, every time someone registers, Meta™ learns. It starts to see patterns in who is signing up. Then it looks for more people like them.
If tracking is broken, the objective is set to traffic or engagement, or the campaign is not generating any conversions early on, Meta™ has nothing useful to work with. That is when you see your ad spend disappear without enough leads or sales.
So before you get lost in targeting options, always start with:
- The right campaign objective.
- Correct tracking and events.
- A funnel that is capable of converting in the first place.
That is the foundation of effective targeting in 2026.
Key 2: Creative and copy matter more than targeting now
This is the biggest shift I have seen over the last six to twelve months.
In 2026, your ads are doing most of the targeting. Not your audience settings. Not a long list of interests.
Your messaging, angles and visuals tell Meta™ who your ad is for. They also decide whether your ideal client stops scrolling, clicks and converts.
Meta™ wants variety. It also needs variety. The system tests different creatives and learns which messages work best for different pockets of your audience.
This means that relying on one or two ad variations is no longer enough if you want strong results. You should be testing:
- Different hooks.
- Different angles and big ideas.
- Different images and videos.
- Different lengths and styles of copy.
All inside a simple structure.
A client case study: reducing cost per lead by 76%
Here is a real example from inside Abundant Ads Academy.
A client came in with a lead magnet campaign that had been running for some time. For a while, she was getting solid results. Her cost per lead was around $2.30, which is very strong.
Over several months, that cost slowly increased until it reached around $4.80. She tried to fix it by changing targeting and making small tweaks, but nothing moved the needle.
When we looked at her account together, my recommendation was simple.
- Start a completely fresh campaign.
- Use one ad set with Advantage+ targeting.
- Upload ten different ad creatives rather than one or two.
Each ad had:
- A different hook.
- A different messaging angle.
- A different visual.
Within 24 hours of launching, her cost per lead dropped to around $1.15.
More importantly, the new leads were more engaged in her email sequence. That told us we were not just getting cheaper leads. We were also attracting better fit people.
That is the power of combining Advantage+ with strong creative variety and good tracking.
Key 3: Specific messaging helps Meta™ find your people
Many advertisers still treat ad copy as something only the human reader sees. In reality, your copy also teaches Meta™ who your ad is meant for.
When your messaging is specific, Meta™ learns faster.
If your ad clearly speaks to:
- Coaches.
- Course creators.
- Mums.
- Business owners at a certain stage.
- Horse owners.
Meta™ starts to see patterns in who clicks and converts. Then it finds more people like them.
Your landing page matters here as well. The message needs to be consistent from ad through to page. That consistency gives Meta™ a clearer signal when it tracks conversions.
Generic copy leads to generic results. Specific copy helps Meta™ narrow in on your ideal audience, even when you are using broad Advantage+ targeting.
The upside and downside of targeting in 2026
In many ways, targeting is simpler now.
You no longer need to spend hours building complicated audience structures. In most accounts a single ad set with Advantage+ targeting performs just as well, if not better, than layered, restrictive audiences.
The trade off is that you now need to put more effort into your creative and copy. Your ads are doing more of the heavy lifting.
That means:
- More time spent understanding your audience.
- More ideas and angles to test.
- More intentional structure for your ad copy.
It is less about finding a magic interest and more about communicating the right message in a way that stands out.
A shortcut if you struggle to write lots of ads
Writing high quality ads is work. You cannot copy and paste generic prompts into a standard AI tool and expect exceptional results.
This is exactly why I created Lily LeadGen.
Lily LeadGen is a custom AI tool that I have coded specifically for Meta™ lead generation ads. It uses the same framework I use when I write ads for my own clients.
You answer a few guided questions about your offer and ideal client. Lily then generates 10 ad variations for you immediately, each one using proven hooks, angles and structures that are designed to convert.
It is currently in beta and available for a one time payment of $27 for lifetime access while I keep improving it.
You can find all the details here..
Final thoughts: where campaigns really win and lose now
If you take one thing from this, let it be this.
Targeting is no longer the main place where campaigns succeed or fail.
Your results now depend much more on:
- Having the right objective and clean tracking.
- Creating strong, specific ad creative with variety.
- Giving Meta™ enough data to learn who your best people are.
When those pieces are in place, Advantage+ targeting can work incredibly well. You can often see results that equal or outperform what used to work with narrow interests and lookalikes.
Instead of chasing secret audiences, focus on the parts you can control. Your message, your creative and your funnel. Meta™ can handle the rest.
I would love to hear your thoughts...